Response to The Ontology of the Photographic Image

In the reading he mentions a lot of history about the paintings and photographs. He also compares it too. I like how he started literally from the beginning which is the Ancient Egypt time to the Renaissance time and so on. I agree with most of what he said like how the aesthetic of photography basically kind of show the reality things. Well thats what i got from that sentence. I also liked how he basically said that paintings and photographs are important. Then he mentioned about how photographs has no limit like you can do anything with it and that was just perfect to me. Photographs to me is like your brain but in a physical film form. Its your choice to what you want to do with it. A limit could be equipment but even that you can find other ways. Also i loved the last few words of the reading which is "cinema is also a language". He could've not that said that any better. Its like learning a whole new language which not a lot of people understands but you can show them.